Insurer Penalized for Mishandling Storm Damage Claim

The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.

The homeowner reported his damages following severe storms that hit in February 2022. The insurance company consulted a builder, referred to as PB, to evaluate the property damages.

PB's assessment claimed that the home had pre-existing damage and lacked waterproof integrity. Specific issues highlighted included clogged gutters, cracked and missing roof tiles, and an unconventional roofing method that permitted water intrusion.

According to PB, the storm did not directly damage the roof but worsened existing issues. This led Auto & General to deny the claim and revoke the policy in October 2022, accusing the homeowner of misrepresenting the property's condition as "good" when the policy began and during its renewal.

The homeowner contested the insurer’s stance, arguing that it was unjust. He presented a separate builder’s report, along with written statements and photographs, which demonstrated a lack of prior wall or ceiling damage.

The policyholder attributed the defects cited by PB to partial make-safe work, asserting that the gutters had been regularly maintained prior to the storm. He also mentioned the emergence of storm-induced mold in sections of his home.

While Auto & General did ultimately reverse its initial claim denial and arrange for a cash settlement the preceding October, the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has decreed that the company must retract its claims of disclosure breach and issue a formal apology.

The AFCA identified “multiple erroneous assertions by PB alleging the complainant had neglected to maintain the property appropriately before the storm,” for which the homeowner provided contradicting proof.

The authority’s ombudsman commented, "I am satisfied the complainant reasonably believed that his home was in good condition and waterproof at the time of policy renewal in July 2021. Moreover, I think a reasonable person would agree with the complainant’s evaluation of his home's condition."

They further stated, "I conclude that the complainant did not misrepresent the property's state. Thus, the insurer made a mistake in deciding to cancel the policy."

The insurer has been directed to pay $2000 to cover non-financial losses due to its oversight in investigating the homeowner’s challenges to PB’s report, failure to acknowledge present mould, and incomplete make-safe actions.

The AFCA concluded that Auto & General should have sought a second, independent evaluation of PB’s findings. The resultant protracted claim process subjected the policyholder and his family to undue stress and anxiety.

The original source of this matter was reported by the Insurance News.

Published:Thursday, 23rd Jan 2025
Author: Paige Estritori

Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

Direct vs Broker: What Youi’s SME Insurance Shift Means

20 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

Youi’s latest comments to the federal parliamentary inquiry into small business insurance have put a practical question back in front of Australian sole traders and small operators: is cheaper, simpler direct insurance always better, or does advice still matter when business risks become more complex? - read more

Tax Audit Cover Demand Rises as ATO Focus Sharpens

20 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

Australian small business owners are showing growing interest in tax audit insurance as the Australian Taxation Office increases compliance attention across several sectors, including professional services. For freelancers, consultants and sole traders, the trend is a timely reminder that tax administration is not just a bookkeeping task; it is a business risk that can create real financial pressure if an enquiry lands at the wrong time. - read more

What a Softer Insurance Market Could Mean for Personal Trainers

20 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

Australia’s commercial insurance market has moved into a more favourable phase for many business buyers in the first half of 2026, with industry reporting pointing to stronger insurer appetite, broader capacity and easing pressure across several key classes. For personal trainers, fitness instructors and small studio operators, the message is not that cover is suddenly simple or cheap. - read more

Mackay Sugar Cyber Incident Highlights a New Risk for Farm Businesses

19 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

A reported ransomware incident affecting Mackay Sugar has put agricultural cyber risk back in the spotlight, this time with a clear lesson for producers who depend on processors, contractors and shared infrastructure. ABC Rural reported on 18 June 2026 that a Russian-speaking ransomware operation known as The Gentlemen had claimed responsibility for a cyber attack that disrupted two Mackay Sugar mills, with the company working to verify the claim and restart Farleigh and Racecourse mills in stages. - read more

What the 2026 Hearing Services Update Means for Allied Health Cover

19 Jun 2026: Paige Estritori

The Australian Government has released the Hearing Services Program Provider Notice 2026-4, confirming that the updated Schedule of Service Items and Fees 2026-27 is now available. While the notice is highly specific to hearing service providers, it carries a broader message for allied health businesses: regulatory changes rarely sit neatly in one folder. They can affect billing, consent, scope of practice, client communications and, ultimately, the way professional risks are insured. - read more

Click for more Insurance News