Insurer Penalized for Mishandling Storm Damage Claim
Insurer Penalized for Mishandling Storm Damage Claim
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
In a recent development, Auto & General has been instructed to both apologize and compensate a Brisbane property owner with a $2000 payment after an inadequate review of his storm damage claim led to an initial denial of coverage and subsequent policy cancellation.
The homeowner reported his damages following severe storms that hit in February 2022. The insurance company consulted a builder, referred to as PB, to evaluate the property damages.
PB's assessment claimed that the home had pre-existing damage and lacked waterproof integrity. Specific issues highlighted included clogged gutters, cracked and missing roof tiles, and an unconventional roofing method that permitted water intrusion.
According to PB, the storm did not directly damage the roof but worsened existing issues. This led Auto & General to deny the claim and revoke the policy in October 2022, accusing the homeowner of misrepresenting the property's condition as "good" when the policy began and during its renewal.
The homeowner contested the insurer’s stance, arguing that it was unjust. He presented a separate builder’s report, along with written statements and photographs, which demonstrated a lack of prior wall or ceiling damage.
The policyholder attributed the defects cited by PB to partial make-safe work, asserting that the gutters had been regularly maintained prior to the storm. He also mentioned the emergence of storm-induced mold in sections of his home.
While Auto & General did ultimately reverse its initial claim denial and arrange for a cash settlement the preceding October, the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has decreed that the company must retract its claims of disclosure breach and issue a formal apology.
The AFCA identified “multiple erroneous assertions by PB alleging the complainant had neglected to maintain the property appropriately before the storm,” for which the homeowner provided contradicting proof.
The authority’s ombudsman commented, "I am satisfied the complainant reasonably believed that his home was in good condition and waterproof at the time of policy renewal in July 2021. Moreover, I think a reasonable person would agree with the complainant’s evaluation of his home's condition."
They further stated, "I conclude that the complainant did not misrepresent the property's state. Thus, the insurer made a mistake in deciding to cancel the policy."
The insurer has been directed to pay $2000 to cover non-financial losses due to its oversight in investigating the homeowner’s challenges to PB’s report, failure to acknowledge present mould, and incomplete make-safe actions.
The AFCA concluded that Auto & General should have sought a second, independent evaluation of PB’s findings. The resultant protracted claim process subjected the policyholder and his family to undue stress and anxiety.
The original source of this matter was reported by the Insurance News.
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
Insurance taxes are back in industry headlines, with renewed pressure on Australian governments to address the levies, duties and charges that can add to the cost of keeping cover in place. For tradies, this is not just a policy debate in Canberra or state parliament. It can flow through to the real cost of protecting tools, vehicles, workshops, stock, public liability exposures and business interruption risks. - read more
APRA’s latest life insurance performance data has again drawn attention to the balancing act facing Australian life insurers: keeping products financially sustainable while maintaining cover that households can understand and afford. For consumers, the headline is not simply whether insurers are profitable. It is whether that performance flows through to more stable premiums, clearer products and better long-term claims support. - read more
Farmer criticism of the Bureau of Meteorology’s redesigned website is more than a technology complaint. For rural businesses, fast and familiar access to weather information can influence decisions about spraying, harvesting, moving livestock, protecting machinery and preparing for severe events. When that information becomes harder to navigate, even temporarily, the practical impact can be felt at the farm gate. - read more
Recent industry reporting on APRA’s latest general insurance performance data points to a healthier operating environment for Australian insurers. Underwriting results have improved, investment income has supported profitability, and the sector remains strongly capitalised. For small and medium-sized businesses, the headline is encouraging, but it should not be read as a simple promise of cheaper cover across every policy class. - read more
Fresh industry discussion around retail crime is a timely reminder that shop insurance is not only about large-scale disasters. For many Australian retailers, the more immediate risks are break-ins, shoplifting, vandalism, smashed glass, damaged fixtures and the trading disruption that follows. These incidents may be smaller than a flood or fire, but repeated losses can still put pressure on cash flow and margins. - read more
In today's rapidly evolving digital landscape, Australian businesses face an ever-increasing array of cyber threats. From sophisticated phishing schemes to ransomware attacks, these dangers lurk in the virtual shadows, often going unnoticed until it's too late. Recognizing and understanding these cyber risks is not just important; it's crucial for the sustainability and success of any modern enterprise. - read more
Cyber risk management involves identifying, assessing, and prioritizing potential risks to an organization's digital assets and implementing measures to mitigate these threats. - read more
In this digital age, online liabilities have become a crucial concern for individuals and businesses alike. At its core, an online liability refers to the potential risks and responsibilities associated with using the internet. These risks can range from data breaches to financial theft, and they have significant implications in our increasingly connected world. - read more
Cybersecurity refers to the practice of protecting systems, networks, and programs from digital attacks. These cyber attacks are usually aimed at accessing, changing, or destroying sensitive information, extorting money from users, or interrupting normal business processes. - read more
Cybersecurity incidents are a growing concern for small businesses. These incidents can have disastrous consequences on the affected businesses and their customers. Cyber insurance policies provide a form of financial protection for small businesses in the event of a cyber-attack. This article will provide an overview of cyber insurance claims and its importance for small business owners. - read more
Knowledgebase
Occupational Hazard: A risk associated with the nature of a particular occupation, which may affect insurance premiums.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.