Insurer Penalized for Mishandling Storm Damage Claim
Insurer Penalized for Mishandling Storm Damage Claim
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
In a recent development, Auto & General has been instructed to both apologize and compensate a Brisbane property owner with a $2000 payment after an inadequate review of his storm damage claim led to an initial denial of coverage and subsequent policy cancellation.
The homeowner reported his damages following severe storms that hit in February 2022. The insurance company consulted a builder, referred to as PB, to evaluate the property damages.
PB's assessment claimed that the home had pre-existing damage and lacked waterproof integrity. Specific issues highlighted included clogged gutters, cracked and missing roof tiles, and an unconventional roofing method that permitted water intrusion.
According to PB, the storm did not directly damage the roof but worsened existing issues. This led Auto & General to deny the claim and revoke the policy in October 2022, accusing the homeowner of misrepresenting the property's condition as "good" when the policy began and during its renewal.
The homeowner contested the insurer’s stance, arguing that it was unjust. He presented a separate builder’s report, along with written statements and photographs, which demonstrated a lack of prior wall or ceiling damage.
The policyholder attributed the defects cited by PB to partial make-safe work, asserting that the gutters had been regularly maintained prior to the storm. He also mentioned the emergence of storm-induced mold in sections of his home.
While Auto & General did ultimately reverse its initial claim denial and arrange for a cash settlement the preceding October, the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has decreed that the company must retract its claims of disclosure breach and issue a formal apology.
The AFCA identified “multiple erroneous assertions by PB alleging the complainant had neglected to maintain the property appropriately before the storm,” for which the homeowner provided contradicting proof.
The authority’s ombudsman commented, "I am satisfied the complainant reasonably believed that his home was in good condition and waterproof at the time of policy renewal in July 2021. Moreover, I think a reasonable person would agree with the complainant’s evaluation of his home's condition."
They further stated, "I conclude that the complainant did not misrepresent the property's state. Thus, the insurer made a mistake in deciding to cancel the policy."
The insurer has been directed to pay $2000 to cover non-financial losses due to its oversight in investigating the homeowner’s challenges to PB’s report, failure to acknowledge present mould, and incomplete make-safe actions.
The AFCA concluded that Auto & General should have sought a second, independent evaluation of PB’s findings. The resultant protracted claim process subjected the policyholder and his family to undue stress and anxiety.
The original source of this matter was reported by the Insurance News.
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) have jointly called on life insurers to take decisive action to address mounting sustainability pressures in the Total and Permanent Disability (TPD) insurance market. This appeal follows a high-level industry roundtable discussion involving senior executives from 19 insurers and reinsurers, as well as representatives from Treasury and the Council of Australian Life Insurers (CALI). - read more
Recent data from the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) reveals a significant concentration of disputes in the life insurance sector, with Total and Permanent Disability (TPD) and disability income insurance (DII) claims accounting for 88% of all disputes. This trend underscores the pressing need for both insurers and policyholders to closely examine the factors contributing to these disputes and seek solutions to enhance the claims process. - read more
Recent findings from the Life Insurance Code Compliance Committee (Life CCC) have revealed a concerning 67% increase in violations related to the timely payment of income protection benefits during the 2024-25 financial year. This surge has raised alarms about the industry's adherence to its own standards and the impact on policyholders. - read more
In a recent joint CEO roundtable, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) highlighted the pressing need for life insurers to take decisive action to address sustainability challenges in the Total and Permanent Disability (TPD) insurance market. - read more
Recent findings from the Life Insurance Code Compliance Committee (Life CCC) have revealed a 67% increase in violations related to timely income protection payments. This surge raises significant concerns about insurer compliance and the impact on customers who rely on these benefits during challenging times. - read more
Cyber threats refer to malicious acts that seek to damage data, steal information, or disrupt digital operations. These threats can come in various forms, such as malware, phishing attacks, ransomware, and more. - read more
As we dive deeper into the digital era, the topic of cyber security becomes increasingly critical. With businesses and individuals relying heavily on digital technologies, the threat of cyber attacks looms larger than ever. This introductory section aims to unpack the concept of cyber insurance as a tool to mitigate these risks. - read more
Cyber Insurance is a type of insurance policy that protects businesses against internet-based risks and threats. This policy covers damages and losses caused by cyber attacks, such as theft of customer information, network downtime, and damage to reputation. - read more
In today's digital age, businesses are increasingly becoming more vulnerable to online threats. Cyber attacks are not just limited to large corporations. Small businesses are also at risk and can suffer severe financial losses due to cyber threats. It is essential for small businesses to invest in cyber insurance. Cyber insurance offers protection against online threats, providing financial assistance if a company experiences a data breach, cyber attack, or other forms of cybercrime. - read more
As the digital economy flourishes, Australian businesses are enjoying the fruits of their own cyber-infrastructure but are also becoming increasingly susceptible to cyber threats. The era of the internet has ushered in a wave of new opportunities, yet it also demands vigilance in the face of growing cyber risks. With cyberattacks becoming more sophisticated and frequent, the imperative for robust cyber security measures has never been more pronounced. - read more
Knowledgebase
Waiting Period: The time period that must pass after filing a claim before the insurance coverage becomes effective or benefits are paid.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.