Insurer Penalized for Mishandling Storm Damage Claim
Insurer Penalized for Mishandling Storm Damage Claim
The information on this website is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation, or needs. Consider seeking personal advice from a licensed adviser before acting on any information.
In a recent development, Auto & General has been instructed to both apologize and compensate a Brisbane property owner with a $2000 payment after an inadequate review of his storm damage claim led to an initial denial of coverage and subsequent policy cancellation.
The homeowner reported his damages following severe storms that hit in February 2022. The insurance company consulted a builder, referred to as PB, to evaluate the property damages.
PB's assessment claimed that the home had pre-existing damage and lacked waterproof integrity. Specific issues highlighted included clogged gutters, cracked and missing roof tiles, and an unconventional roofing method that permitted water intrusion.
According to PB, the storm did not directly damage the roof but worsened existing issues. This led Auto & General to deny the claim and revoke the policy in October 2022, accusing the homeowner of misrepresenting the property's condition as "good" when the policy began and during its renewal.
The homeowner contested the insurer’s stance, arguing that it was unjust. He presented a separate builder’s report, along with written statements and photographs, which demonstrated a lack of prior wall or ceiling damage.
The policyholder attributed the defects cited by PB to partial make-safe work, asserting that the gutters had been regularly maintained prior to the storm. He also mentioned the emergence of storm-induced mold in sections of his home.
While Auto & General did ultimately reverse its initial claim denial and arrange for a cash settlement the preceding October, the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) has decreed that the company must retract its claims of disclosure breach and issue a formal apology.
The AFCA identified “multiple erroneous assertions by PB alleging the complainant had neglected to maintain the property appropriately before the storm,†for which the homeowner provided contradicting proof.
The authority’s ombudsman commented, "I am satisfied the complainant reasonably believed that his home was in good condition and waterproof at the time of policy renewal in July 2021. Moreover, I think a reasonable person would agree with the complainant’s evaluation of his home's condition."
They further stated, "I conclude that the complainant did not misrepresent the property's state. Thus, the insurer made a mistake in deciding to cancel the policy."
The insurer has been directed to pay $2000 to cover non-financial losses due to its oversight in investigating the homeowner’s challenges to PB’s report, failure to acknowledge present mould, and incomplete make-safe actions.
The AFCA concluded that Auto & General should have sought a second, independent evaluation of PB’s findings. The resultant protracted claim process subjected the policyholder and his family to undue stress and anxiety.
The original source of this matter was reported by the Insurance News.
Please Note: We do not endorse any specific products or companies. Some content is sourced from third parties, including press releases, and may not be independently verified for accuracy or completeness.
Insurance held through superannuation is again attracting attention as regulators and industry observers focus on how members and their families are supported when a claim is made. The latest discussion centres on a familiar but important issue: many Australians have life, total and permanent disability or income protection cover inside their super fund, yet may not fully understand the policy rules until illness, injury or death forces the issue. - read more
Recent insurance industry commentary on severe weather claims has reinforced a familiar message for Australian rental property owners: natural hazards are no longer occasional background risks. Storms, floods, bushfires and cyclones are increasingly shaping insurance affordability, availability and policy design, particularly in regions where exposure is already well understood by insurers. - read more
New Zealand's insurance law reforms are moving from policy debate into practical preparation, and life insurance customers should pay attention. The changes are designed to modernise old insurance rules, improve contract fairness and make the responsibilities of both insurers and consumers easier to understand. For households considering life, trauma, total and permanent disability or income protection cover, the key point is not that applications become less serious. It is that the process should become clearer and more proportionate. - read more
Recent business and labour market reporting has kept the spotlight on a softer jobs market, with many households paying closer attention to job security, hours of work and the strength of their emergency savings. For New Zealand workers, the financial question is not only whether employment conditions are changing. It is whether the household could keep functioning if income stopped for a reason outside their control. - read more
A fresh round of insurance industry warnings about climate exposure is a timely reminder for Australian truck operators that weather risk is no longer a background issue. Floods, bushfires, severe storms and prolonged road closures can affect far more than a single damaged vehicle. For owner-drivers and fleet managers, the larger concern is often the chain reaction: stranded equipment, missed delivery windows, cargo complications, depot damage and extended downtime while repair networks are under pressure. - read more
Many cyber insurance policies operate on a claims-made basis, which means timing can affect whether a cyber incident is covered. This guide explains policy periods, notification, retroactive dates, known circumstances and continuity of cover for Australian businesses reviewing cyber insurance wording. - read more
As we dive deeper into the digital era, the topic of cyber security becomes increasingly critical. With businesses and individuals relying heavily on digital technologies, the threat of cyber attacks looms larger than ever. This introductory section aims to unpack the concept of cyber insurance as a tool to mitigate these risks. - read more
In an age where digital presence intertwines with daily operations, the threat landscape in Australia has magnified, exposing businesses to an evolving array of cyber threats. From sophisticated phishing attempts to ransomware attacks, the risk of digital insecurity looms large. Australia, with its growing technological adoption, finds itself facing an upsurge in cyber threat incidents year over year. - read more
In today's digital age, the rising importance of cybersecurity for small businesses in Australia cannot be overstated. As technology permeates every aspect of business operations, it offers tremendous advantages but also exposes small businesses to a growing array of cyber threats. These threats are increasingly targeting small companies, seeking to exploit vulnerabilities and potentially cause significant financial and reputational damage. - read more
Australian businesses that experience a data breach may need to assess whether the Notifiable Data Breaches scheme applies, notify the OAIC and affected individuals, report cybercrime through ReportCyber, and carefully document their response. This guide explains the key notification and reporting steps in general terms, and how cyber insurance may support breach response planning. - read more
Knowledgebase
Insurance Deductible: That part of an insurance claim that must be paid by an insured person before the the balance is paid by the insurer.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.